Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-11T12:20:51.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2025

William A. Edmundson
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Social Contract
Political Equality from Putney to Rawls
, pp. 223 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2023. Hijacked: How Neoliberalism Turned the Work Ethic against Workers and How Workers Can Take It Back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcenas, Claire Rydell. 2023. America’s Philosopher: John Locke in American Intellectual Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1973. Some ordinalist-utilitarian notes on Rawls’s theory of justice. The Journal of Philosophy 70(9): 245–63.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard. 1986. Revolutionary Politics and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Kurt. 1989. Justice and the aims of political philosophy. Ethics 99(4): 771–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1975. Justifying justice: problems of psychology, politics and measurement in Rawls. In Daniels 1975, pp. 292–318.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2014. What is liberalism? Political Theory 42(6): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1818. Plan of Parliamentary Reform in the Form of a Catechism with Reasons for Each Article. London: T. J. Wooler.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert and Mann, Anika Maaza. 2005. The contradictions of racism: Locke, slavery, and the Two Treatises. In Valls, Andrew, ed., Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy, pp. 89107. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David. 2022. Mill’s moral and political philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, eds., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/mill-moral-political/.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1975. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1988. The Political Economy of the Welfare State. Stockholm: The Industrial Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. 2014. Thomas Paine: the English dimension. In Paine 2014, pp. 579–601.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1986. Structure, choice, and legitimacy: Locke’s theory of the state. Philosophy & Public Affairs 15(4): 301–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2010. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2023. Reflections on democracy’s fragility. In Weithman 2023, pp. 313–35.Google Scholar
Colletti, Lucio. 1972. Rousseau as critic of “civil society.” In Colletti, Lucio, From Rousseau to Lenin: Studies in Ideology and Society, pp. 143–93. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 2006 [1956]. A Preface to Democratic Theory, 50th anniversary ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, ed. 1975. Reading Rawls: Critical Studies of A Theory of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. 2002. Actual Social Contract and Political Obligation. Lewiston, ME: Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Ian. 1992. William Cobbett and Rural Popular Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2016. Coercion, stability, and indoctrination in the pejorative sense. Jurisprudence 7(3): 540–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2018. Moral education and the ethics of consent. In Schaber, Peter and Müller, Andreas, eds., The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent, pp. 372–83. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2020a. What is the argument for the fair value of political liberty? Social Theory and Practice 46(1): 497514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William A. 2020b. Tolerating the conditionally tolerant: the uneasy case of salvation religions. Democratic Theory 7(1): 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David. 2023. One person, at least one vote? Rawls on political liberty … within limits. In Weithman 2023, pp. 296–312.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 1990. Reason and agreement in social contract viewsPhilosophy and Public Affairs 19(2): 122–57.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007. Rawls. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2023. Reasonable political conceptions and the well-ordered society. In Weithman 2023, pp. 257–76.Google Scholar
Fried, Barbara H. 2014. The unwritten Theory of Justice: Rawlsian liberalism versus libertarianism. In Mandle, Jon and Reidy, David A., eds., A Companion to Rawls, pp. 430–49. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1977. The social contract as ideology. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (2): 130–64.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1979. David Hume: contractarian. Philosophical Review 88(1): 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 2015. What is democracy (and what is its raison d’etre)? Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1(2): 233–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, J. W. 1957. The Social Contract: A Critical Study of Its Evolution, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, David, and Wengrow, David. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1975. Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. The American Political Science Review, 69(2): 594606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1964. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1975. Rawls on liberty and its priority. In Daniels 1975, 230–52.Google Scholar
Hartley, Christie. 2009. Justice for the disabled: a contractualist approach. Journal of Social Philosophy 40(1): 1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2024. A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. 2019 [1972]. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hirose, Iwao. 2015. Egalitarianism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan (any edition showing 1651 “Head” pagination; cited as Lev.).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1991. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing (cited as DC).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 2010 [1679]. Behemoth or the Long Parliament, ed. Seward, Paul. Oxford: Clarendon Press (cited as Beh.).Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1777. My own life. https://davidhume.org/texts/mol/.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1778. The History of England, 6 vols. Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1962 [1751]. An Enquiry Concerning the Human Understanding and the Principles of Morals, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press (cited as Enq.).Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1979 [1748]. Of the Original Contract. In MacIntyre 1979, pp. 255–73 (cited as OC).Google Scholar
Jones, Bradley. 2018. Most Americans want to limit campaign spending, say big donors have greater political influence. Pew Research Center (May 8) https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/05/08/most-americans-want-to-limit-campaignspending-say-big-donors-have-greater-political-influence/.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1964 [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Paton, H. J.. New York: Harper & Row (the translations in the text have been modified; page references are to the Prussian Academy edition).Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Megan. 2018. Seventy percent of Americans support “Medicare for all” in new poll. The Hill (August 23) https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/403248-poll-seventypercent-of-americans-support-medicare-for-all.Google Scholar
Kidd, Colin. 2024. Antidote to Marx. London Review of Books 46(1), January, www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v46/n01/colin-kidd/antidote-to-marx.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2018. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2022. Thinking in good company. The John Dewey Lecture delivered at the 118th Eastern Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
Krouse, Richard, and McPherson, Michael. 1988. Capitalism, “property-owning democracy,” and the welfare state. In Gutmann, Amy, ed., Democracy and the Welfare State, pp. 79105. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1991. The social contract tradition, in Singer, Peter, ed., A Companion to Ethics, pp. 186–96. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1988. Introduction. In Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, student ed., pp. 3122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. 1962. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. H. 1901. The organic theory of society: the passing of contract theory. The American Journal of Sociology 6(5): 577601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2023. Taillight illumination: How Rawlsian concepts may improve understanding of Hobbes’s political philosophy. In Weithman 2023, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1689. A Letter Concerning Toleration, trans. William Popple, https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/locke/toleration.pdf (cited as LCT).Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1690. The Second Treatise of Government (various editions; cited as ST).Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975 [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press (cited as Essay).Google Scholar
Luce, R. Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard. 1989 [1957]. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. 1975. Nature and soundness of the contract and coherence arguments. In Daniels 1975, pp. 141–67.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alaisdair, ed. 1979. Hume’s Ethical Writings. Notre Dame IN: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1996 [1867]. Capital, vol. 1. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus Thomas. 1949. Free Government in the Making: Readings in American Political Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1977a [1832]. Use and abuse of political terms. In Essays on Politics and Society: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 18, ed. Robson, J. M., pp. 113. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1977b [1861]. Considerations on representative government. In Essays on Politics and Society: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 19, ed. Robson, J. M., pp. 371577. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1977c [1861]. Utilitarianism. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 10, ed. Robson, J. M., pp. 203–33. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1999. The Racial Contract. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, Philip. 2000. John Locke and the Rye House Plot. The Historical Journal 43(3): 647–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 2013. Rousseau’s critique of economic inequality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 41: 193225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nidditch, Peter H. 1975. Foreword to Locke 1975.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2024. Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1970. The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters, vol. 1, An Age Like This 1920–1940. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. 2014. Selected Writings of Thomas Paine, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Calvert, Jane E.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1992. Introduction. In Harrington, James, The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, ed. Pocock, J. G. A., pp. viixxiv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. Minimalist conception of democracy: a defense. In Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordon, C., eds., Democracy’s Value, pp. 2355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice, original ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as TJO).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1998 . Political Liberalism, revised draft, unpublished (cited as PLR).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as TJ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as CP).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999c. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as LP).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as LHMP).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as JF).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism, expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press (cited as PL).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (cited as LHPP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiff, Mark R. 2012. The difference principle, rising inequality, and supply-side economics: how Rawls got hijacked by the right. Revue de philosophie économique 13: 119–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 2006. Social contract and its critics. In Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert, eds., The Cambridge History of Eighteenth Century Political Thought, pp. 347–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Matthew. 2020. Chartism, Commemoration and the Cult of the Radical Hero. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, Ben. 2002. Obituary: John Rawls. The Guardian (November 27) https://www.theguardian.com/news/2002/nov/27/guardianobituaries.obituaries.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, David. 1987. Rousseau’s unanimous contract and the doctrine of popular sovereignty. History of Political Thought 8(1): 83110.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (cited as SC).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2019. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, Victor, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (cited as SD).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 2018. Why Does Inequality Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2023. Moral independence revisited: a note on the development of Rawls’s thought from 1977-1980 and beyond. In Weithman 2023, pp. 121–39.Google Scholar
Schouten, Gina. 2019. Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Shelby, Tommie. 2023. Race, reparations, and justice as fairness. In Weithman 2023, pp. 199–219.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1966. Rousseau’s two models: Sparta and the age of gold. Political Science Quarterly 81(1): 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2001. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2016. Locke on the social contract. In Stuart, Matthew, ed., A Companion to Locke, pp. 413–32. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics, vol. 3, Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Cynthia. 2000. Hypothetical consent and justification. The Journal of Philosophy 97(6): 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2020. Maximin. Yale Journal on Regulation 37(3): 940–79.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. 1972. The Levellers and the franchise. In Aylmer, G. E., ed. The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement 1646–1660, pp. 5778. London: Archon Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dorothy. 1984. The Chartists: Popular Politics in the Industrial Revolution. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. 2016. Locke’s political philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2020 ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/locke-political/.Google Scholar
Upham, S. Phineas. 2002. Philosophers in Conversation: Interviews from The Harvard Review of Philosophy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallier, Kevin. 2023. Public reason at fifty. In Weithman 2023, pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
Venezia, Luciano. 2013. Crucial evidence: Hobbes on contractual obligation. Journal of the Philosophy of History 7: 106–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmann, Felix. 2021. John Locke as a reader of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan: A new manuscript. The Journal of Modern History 93(2): 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1987. Theoretical foundations of Liberalism. The Philosophical Quarterly 37(147): 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, J. C., and Waldmann, Felix. 2019. John Locke and the toleration of Catholics: a new manuscript. The Historical Journal 62(4): 1093–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weithman, Paul, ed. 2023. Rawls’s A Theory of Justice at 50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2023. A society of self-respect. In Weithman 2023, pp. 336–55.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. S. P. 1986. Puritanism and Liberty: Being the Army Debates from the Clarke Manuscripts with Supplementary Documents, 3rd ed. London: J. M. Dent and Sons (cited as Put.).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • William A. Edmundson, Georgia State University
  • Book: The Social Contract
  • Online publication: 30 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009395274.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • William A. Edmundson, Georgia State University
  • Book: The Social Contract
  • Online publication: 30 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009395274.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • William A. Edmundson, Georgia State University
  • Book: The Social Contract
  • Online publication: 30 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009395274.019
Available formats
×